肯定判断【英】
affirmative judgment
译文来源
Kant's theory of judgement. via: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/
定义
逻辑名词(《新知识词典》编辑室,1958:882)。同“否定判断”相对。反映对象具有某种属性的判断(中华书局辞海编辑所,1961:176)。直言判断按质划分的一种。肯定判断反映思想对象与属性之间是肯定的逻辑关系,主项与谓项通过联项“是”联结起来。肯定判断的形式结构为:“S是P”(《逻辑学辞典》编辑委员会,1983:458)。反映的思想对象与属性是肯定关系(张宝琪,1988:287)。在语言表达中,肯定判断联项“是”有时可以省略(曹文趣等,2000:668)。即“肯定命题”。肯定判断反映思维对象与性质之间具有肯定的逻辑联系,主项与谓项通过联项“是” 联结起来。肯定判断有时为了突出断定的语气,也常用双重否定句或反问否定句的语言形式。肯定判断根据量项不同,可分为单称肯定判断、特称肯定判断和全称肯定判断。(肯定判断.via:http://kns.cnki.net/kns/brief/default_result.aspx)。
定义来源
[1] 《新知识词典》编辑室.新知识词典[Z].新知识出版社,1958.
[2] 中华书局辞海编辑所.辞海试行本(第2分册)哲学[M].中华书局辞海编辑所,1961.
[3] 《逻辑学辞典》编辑委员会.逻辑学辞典[Z].吉林人民出版社,1983.
[4] 张宝琪.简明哲学词典[Z].山东大学出版社,1988.
[5] 曹文趣,王祖勋,冯中杰,刘云泉.中学语文教学实用大全[M].浙江教育出版社,2000.
[6] 肯定判断.via:http://kns.cnki.net/kns/brief/default_result.aspx.
网络参考例句
例句 1:
本文探讨了肯定判断谓项的周延性与排中律的适用范围两个问题,就“肯定判断的谓项有时周延”的主要论点进行了逐一评述,论证了“所有肯定判断的谓项都不周延”。——“ 对传统逻辑中几个问题的探析”,载于《西南政法大学学报》2002年第4期
This article probes into two problems: the scope of the principle of excluded middle, the distribution of predicate in the positive judgment. On the statement that the predicate in the positive judgment sometimes is distributive, the main point is reviewed in detail. It is argued that all predicates in the positive judgment are undistributed.
例句 2:
莫里茨·石里克是逻辑经验主义重要代表人物,其认识论观点集中表现在《普通认识论》中。石里克的认识论主要从逻辑学入手,将判断作为认识论研究的重要对象,判断理论贯穿其整个认识论。他认为,判断的本质就是标示事实的记号,判断始终标示对象之间关系的存在,所以不存在单项判断;石里克主要探讨了出现于认识论中的肯定判断和否定判断、全称判断和特称判断、必然判断和或然判断、分析判断和综合判断等在构建科学知识上的作用。——《莫里茨·石里克判断理论研究》,内蒙古大学硕士学位论文,2015
Moritz Schlick is one of the founding father of Logical Empiricism, and his thoughts of epistemology are intensively included in his Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre (General Theory of Knowledge). Schlick’s epistemology takes judgment as the research object from the aspect of Logistics, and judgment theory penetrates his whole epistemology He believes that the essence of judgment is the sign which indicates fact, and judgment always indicates the relationship between objects. Thus, there is no monomial judgment. Besides, Schlick mainly discusses the effects of positive judgment and nega